Jeremy Bolick and Clay Keys:
As you're both quite vociferous in your support of AZU I'd like to clarify some issues.
AZU support publicly accessible registers of sex offenders in order for people to be able to identify the sex offenders in their community. My questions to you both are:
* Do you support AZU's position on this?
* If so, have you actively informed those living in your street and nearby streets that you are convicted child sex offenders and that people should be wary of you?
* If you don't support AZU's position on this, why haven't you stated so publicly?
The more unbalanced members of AZU advocate that paedophiles and child sex offenders should commit suicide. My questions to you both are:
* Do you support AZU's position on this?
* If so, is this not extreme hypocrisy given that you are both convicted child sex offenders and yet neither of you have committed suicide?
* If you don't support AZU's position on this, why haven't you stated so publicly?
AZU support a 'one strike' policy whereby all convicted sex offenders are permanently locked up following their first conviction. Further, they support mandatory civil confinement for any non-offenders with a paedophilic or hebephilic sexual orientation or anyone who supports them. My questions to you both are:
* Do you support AZU's position on this?
* If so, given that you have both already had your first strike (in Jeremy's case, three strikes that we know of) what steps have you taken to have yourselves forcibly confined?
* If you don't support AZU's position on this, why haven't you stated so publicly?
There are plenty more questions that I will have for you but this will do for now. Do I actually expect you to answer them? Of course not. I know you're both cowards who'll avoid any sort of accountability but still, someone needs to ask them.
My own belief is that you are both filthy hypocrites who support AZU's rhetoric as long as it doesn't actually get applied to you. I doubt very much you'll be able to truthfully answer my questions without your hypocrisy being exposed for all to see.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
12 comments:
Good questions! I'd love to hear their answers!
Well, it remains to be seen if either of them have the courage to answer them honestly. From what I know of them, I doubt either has the moral character to do so.
pf course they don't support AZU's positions. One of these "defectors" was no longer welcome in any of our groups so he went to the only place that was available. Is this whole nest of pretenders made up of the Clay's and the Static's of the world? There is probably not a sincere soul in the bunch.
Well, maybe Violet. In a softer moment she says she feels empty inside and that must be true. The only place she is accepted is a group of perverts boiling with over personal problems. If any of them have truly been abused why don't they publicize the info on their abusers? Isn't that what the site is about? That is what they say but it isn't what they do. Like Clay and Static maybe they are the abusers hiding behind a facade of outrage.
It is funny how AZU hascome to defend those two. Sounds hypocritical if you ask me. But hey, we all know the truth; AZU only exists to hate. They don't give a fuck about kids. Funny thing is, my feud with them started when I embarrassed AZU members in a public rally in Ohio in 2007, and if these people believed RSOs to be so dangerous, why did they bring their children to that event?
...yawn...zzzzz.....
Angee - The very fact that Clay and Jeremy associate with these extremists and yet don't follow through on the very things AZU stand for make them the worst kind of hypocrites. They delight in seeing the weaknesses of others exposed and yet don't have the courage of their 'convictions' to subject themselves to the same standards.
As for Violent Leaves, we only have her word that she was abused. Given how dishonest and deliberately deceptive the rest of AZU are, I'd not be surprised at all to find this is one big lie too. It may seem uncharitable to doubt her word but, as the saying goes, if you lay down with dogs, you get up with fleas. If she really was abused, she needs to get psychiatric help as associating with unbalanced individuals like Stitches77 and hypocrites like Jeremy and Clay isn't doing anything to improve her mental health. We've seen through her comments how much she delights in the thought of others being raped and brutalised, yet rather than urging her to seek professional help, the AZU freaks reinforce and encourage this perversion.
http://absolutezerounites.blogspot.com/2009/12/azu-infiltrated-by-same-pedophiles.html
Angee, Here is AZU attacking TSand/RoarForTruth and Static in the past. Both are now full charter members of AZU. All TSand and Static had to do is emasculate themselves as a sacrifice to the megalomaniacal "Stitches of the seventy and seven."
Like pretty much everything I say, I back it up with evidence.
The truth is, the REAL reason AZU recently changed their comment boards is people was going to my anti-anti site and seeing that unlike AZU and co., everything I say about the enemy is true. 100% fact.
"In a softer moment she says she feels empty inside and that must be true."
Duh. No-brainer there, the wicked hag's a psychopath. That's her good side you see - nothing there!
"The truth is, the REAL reason AZU recently changed their comment boards is people was going to my anti-anti site and seeing that unlike AZU and co., everything I say about the enemy is true. 100% fact."
Keep dreaming Derek! Your big mouth is the cause of your demise & you provide such good fodder!
Now Stitches & I do NOT agree on every issue but we have a common goal in hand & we work with each other despite our disagreements.
Derek is jealous because AZ refuses to allow him to spew his crap opinions & he runs around lying thru his quivering lips that he is a good guy when AZ has proved otherwise!
Derek is always good for a quick laugh. I enjoy his silly ranting antics!
Violent Leaves needs to be civilly committed. Simple as that.
By the way Voice of Reason, LOL at TSand's response to your questions on his trash blog
http://roarfortruth.blogspot.com/2010/01/voice-of-unreason.html
This is the link to Clay's partial response. He's yet to answer the questions about how AZU's policies should be applied to him. My gut feeling is that he would see them applied to other child sex offenders (possibly including Jeremy who's still avoiding the matter) but not to himself.
Of course he makes the same unsupported claims that I'm a paedosexual as Jeremy did as if that somehow invalidates my questions. Sorry - not so. Regardless of who asked the questions or their sexual orientation, the questions are relevant and your partial response is very telling indeed.
I've quite analyzed his answers at my blog too. He's speaking as if he's not an RSO. It is hypocrisy at its finest!sylesho
Post a Comment